Submitted by testuser42 in this thread: message/view/evidence+vs.+conclusions/30847149
(please read, if interested)
Also available as PDF
- I used "hypothesis" since someone said "conclusion" is too final. But "conclusion" seems to be more common.
- The first row of "hypothesis persons" should be included in the "evidence persons", since they are very basic deductions. Tom's "vitals" are perfect for this information.
- The analysis or reasoning for the hypotheses should probably be more than just a standard "note".
I would love to see a (little) more complex example in a pseudo-BG (or DeadEnds or GEDCOM) format, so I could try to diagram that. What will happen when a few more sources and evidence lead to additional information and events? Will new conclusion persons need new conclusion events?