1. How would you rate the ease of use of the GoToMeeting interface for our 3 Jan 2011 Developers Meeting?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Above Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Below Average
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Not so Good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00%
|
5
|
|
|
2. How would you rate the sound quality for the GoToMeeting Developers Meeting 3 Jan 2011?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Above Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00%
|
5
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Below Average
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Not so Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
3. How would you rate the starting time of the Developers Meeting?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.00%
|
8
|
|
Above Average
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
Below Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
Not so Good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
|
4. How would you rate the length of the Developers Meeting?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Above Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Below Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Not so Good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00%
|
5
|
|
|
5. Which best describes the hardware you used to connect to the Developers Meeting 3 January 2011?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Computer, high speed internet, headset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Computer, high speed internet, computer mic & speakers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.00%
|
4
|
|
Computer, high speed internet and telephone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
Telephone only.
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
|
6. What did you think of the agenda overall?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Above Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.00%
|
4
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Below Average
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Not so good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
|
On reflection it was too long - but probably wasn't far off what I'd have put in!
|
|
7. What did you think of attendee participation overall?
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Excellent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00%
|
5
|
|
Above Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00%
|
3
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Below Average
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Not so good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
A good first introductory meeting. Shows how tough these are going to be to stay on track. Always needs a moderator to keep it going. Thanks, you did a good job Pat.
|
|
8. What did you think of the topics we discussed for our first developers meeting? (Multiple choice.)
|
|
|
answered question
|
10
|
|
|
skipped question
|
0
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
Relevant content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.00%
|
7
|
|
Motivational
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00%
|
2
|
|
Good use of time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.00%
|
6
|
|
Not relevant to my day to day job
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
Not so good
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Wouldn't inspire me to give my best
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00%
|
1
|
|
|
9. How would you rate the experience participating in the meeting? Rating Scale 1-5 (1 being Unsatisfactory, 5 being Exceeded my expectations)
|
|
|
answered question
|
6
|
|
|
skipped question
|
4
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
1
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
2
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.30%
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.70%
|
4
|
|
10. How would you rate the overall running of the event? Rating Scale 1-5 (1 being Unsatisfactory, 5 being Exceeded my expectations)
|
|
|
answered question
|
6
|
|
|
skipped question
|
4
|
|
|
Response
|
Response
|
|
Percent
|
Count
|
|
1
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
2
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
3
|
|
0.00%
|
0
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.30%
|
2
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.70%
|
4
|
|
Comments (please specify)
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.30%
|
2
|
|
|
Compliments to the chair.
|
|
|
Good job Pat!
|
|
|
11. Can you suggest ways in which we can improve the BetterGEDCOM Developers Meeting in the future?See below.
|
|
|
answered question
|
6
|
|
|
|
skipped question
|
4
|
|
|
|
Response
|
|
|
Count
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
12. Your BetterGEDCOM WikiSpaces ID (optional)
|
|